Pollster.com

January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007

 

Cell Phone Update

Yesterday, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) released its latest estimates of the number of Americans living in households without landline telephones, as well as a statistic closely watched by pollsters: During the first six months of 2006, "approximately 10.5 percent of households do not have a traditional landline telephone, but do have at least one wireless telephone."

Pollsters have been watching the growth in "cell phone only" households because cell phones are largely out of reach of the traditional random digit dial sampling methods used in most conventional telephone surveys. As such, the continuing upward tend in such households illustrated by the NCHS surveys (which involve massive monthly in-person samples of Americans), should be of great interest to anyone who follows public opinion polling.

1-18%20NCHS%20fig1small.png

Although I have written about these issues previously (here, here, here and here), the best analysis of how this trend has affected the accuracy of public polling has been done by the Pew Research Center. Last year, in partnership with the Associated Press and America Online, they conducted parallel surveys: One using conventional telephone sampling and another that interviewed a random sample of 750 mobile phone users over their mobile phones. The study produced a report by the Pew Research Center (available in either HTML or PDF format) reached the following conclusions:

[Cell only Americans] are younger, less affluent, less likely to be married or to own their home, and more liberal on many political questions.

Yet despite these differences, the absence of this group from traditional telephone surveys has only a minimal impact on the results. Specifically, the study shows that including cell-only respondents with those interviewed from a standard landline sample, and weighting the resulting combined sample to the full U.S. public demographically, changes the overall results of the poll by no more than one percentage point on any of nine key political questions included in the study.

Of course, given the trend reported by NCHS, the cell-phone only adult population appears to be a moving target. It has more than doubled in the last two years, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. How big a problem will cell-phone only households be in 2008? Will their absence from traditional phone surveys begin to impact results? Will pollsters begin to routinely incorporate more expensive cell phone samples into their surveys? Time will tell.

By Mark Blumenthal on January 19, 2007 5:02 PM | | Comments (4) | TrackBacks (0)

New Statewide Polls from ARG

New statewide surveys from American Research Group test contests for the Democratic and Republican presidential nomination in Michigan, Missouri, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, New Mexico, California, and North Carolina.

Republican Democrat
Michigan Michigan
Missouri Missouri
Florida Florida
Pennsylvania Pennsylvania
Illinois Illinois
New Mexico New Mexico
California California
North Carolina North Carolina

By Eric Dienstfrey on January 19, 2007 3:01 PM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

New Statewide Polls from SurveyUSA

Today SurveyUSA released statewide approval ratings for 16 Governors:

From the same surveys, SurveyUSA also recently released results of head-to-head general election match-ups pitting Democrat Sen. Barack Obama against Republicans Sen. John McCain, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, and former Gov. Mitt Romney.

McCain Giuliani Romney
Obama Alabama Alabama Alabama
Obama California California California
Obama Iowa Iowa Iowa
Obama Kansas Kansas Kansas
Obama Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky
Obama Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts
Obama Minnesota Minnesota Minnesota
Obama Missouri Missouri Missouri
Obama New Mexico New Mexico New Mexico
Obama New York New York New York
Obama Ohio Ohio Ohio
Obama Oregon Oregon Oregon
Obama Texas Texas Texas
Obama Virginia Virginia Virginia
Obama Washington Washington Washington
Obama Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin

By Eric Dienstfrey on January 19, 2007 2:41 PM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Daily Roundup 1.19.07

  • A new Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll finds 52% of Americans think "sending about 22,000 additional U.S. troops" will "make no difference" in "stabilizing the situation in Iraq." On a separate question, 61% consider the recent plan to send additional troops to be Bush's "last chance for victory in Iraq" (story, results).

  • A new Diageo/Hotline survey shows 35% of Americans approve of Bush's job as president, while 29% approve of Bush's handling of the situation in Iraq.

  • Gallup Poll offers historical analysis of Presidential job approval yearly averages. From January 20th, 2006 to January 19th, 2007 Bush's job approval average was 37.3%, the forth-lowest average since 1945.

By Eric Dienstfrey on January 19, 2007 12:02 PM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

The Dynamics of Reaction to Bush's Surge Speech

1SurgeChangeAllsmall.png

Shifts in opinion on Iraq immediately following President Bush's speech last week were not as uniformly negative as some reporting implied. However, the response turned more negative as time passed following the speech. The immediate aftermath of the speech found generally small shifts, yet more of these moved towards the administration's positions than against them. In contrast, by the weekend and later polls found most opinion moving against the administration. This difference reflects the role of congressional reaction and media coverage of that reaction in shaping response over time, in contrast to the immediate response to the speech itself.

There are now five polls conducted entirely after President Bush's speech on Iraq last week. (CBS News did a "call back" with previously interviewed respondents the night of the speech. I'm leaving that out because it isn't a fresh sample and not all original respondents could be reached that night.) ABC/Washington Post did a post-speech survey on January 10. CNN/Opinion Research Corporation (CNN/ORC) conducted a poll on 1/11. The Pew Research Center conducted interviews 1/10-15. USAToday/Gallup polled 1/12-14. LATimes/Bloomberg interviewed 1/13-16.

While partially overlapping, these polls are ordered in time and let us look at how reaction to the speech has developed over time. The Pew survey had the longest field period and completely overlaps the USAToday/Gallup poll. Pew has two days of interviews before Gallup began and one day after Gallup. I'm assuming this means the average Pew respondent was interviewed earlier than the average Gallup respondent. Polls often (but not always) complete most of their interviews early in the interviewing period, which would push the average Pew date earlier as well, but I don't know if that was true of this specific Pew poll. If this assumption is false, then my story below is not quite so neat so bear this caveat in mind.

There are a large number of questions that have been asked about Iraq in these polls. Each reflects support or opposition to some aspect of the administration's policies, approval or disapproval of the President's handling of Iraq, and optimism or pessimism about the prospects for success in Iraq. Usually we focus on a single question such as support or opposition for the troop increase. But we can also get a sense of how the wider range of opinion is shifting by looking at a number of questions simultaneously. Here I take the latter approach. The data I use are all questions in any of the five surveys for which there is a "before" and "after" reading of opinion. Most of the "before" readings are from January or December, though a few come from earlier. The specific questions are listed at the bottom of this post.

The figure above shows how opinion shifted from before to after the speech for all these items. The arrows begin at the "before" and point to the "after" poll result. In this figure I don't try to label the specific questions (I do that below.) Here the idea is to look at the overall direction of movement.

The horizontal axis plots negative opinions about the war or the administration, while the vertical axis plots positive views. The closer to the diagonal line a poll is the more people expressed a positive or negative opinion, while the closer to the lower left corner the more people said they didn't have an opinion or adopted a neutral position (such as the increase in troops won't affect the outcome either way.)

Arrows that point toward the upper left corner indicate movement that favors the administration's positions, moves toward a more positive view of the president (or a negative view towards the Democrats) or expresses increased optimism (or reduced pessimism) toward the war or its likely outcome. So arrows pointing "northwest" (or due west) are good for the administration. Arrows pointing the opposite direction, southeast or due south, are the opposite: bad news for the administration. The longer the arrow, the bigger the change.