Pollster.com

Articles and Analysis

 

Later Tonight: An Innovative Post Debate Survey

Topics: 2008 , Debates , The 2008 Race

The pollster/public relations firm known as InsiderAdvantage announced today that they will be conducting an "unprecedented" poll, sponsored by the Florida Chamber of Commerce, to determine "the winner" of tonight's CNN/YouTube debate:

Because public-survey phone calls are illegal after 9 pm, InsiderAdvantage placed over 100,000 calls to registered Republicans in Florida over the past week-and-a-half, with the criteria of finding undecided registered Republican voters who said they planned to watch the debate, and who agreed to call a special toll-free number immediately after the debate to answer questions about which candidate won the contest.
Data should be collected by 10:20 pm,” said Jeff Shusterman of Majority Opinion, InsiderAdvantage’s research partners. “We will weight the data for age, gender, and geographic location, and should have results between 10:30 and 10:45.”
The results will be announced by live webcast on www.southernpoliticalreport.com, and www.insideradvantage.com from the debate site in St. Petersburg, and will be released to the media immediately after.

I was curious about the mechanics of this project, so I called Gary Reese of InsiderAdvantage. According the Reese, they made those 100,000 calls using an interactive voice response (IVR) method in which respondents hear recorded questions and answer by pressing keys on their touch-tone phones. Although they dialed 100,000 of Florida's 3.9 million registered Republicans, they were able to identify only about a thousand households willing to dial back in.

So for those who see (or are tempted to report) the results, keep in mind that this survey can only truly represent a tiny sliver of registered Florida Republicans: The roughly 1% with no preference who were planning to watch the debate and willing to call back. Of course, the audience itself is likely to be not much bigger as a percentage of U.S. households. The CNN/YouTube Democratic debate in July drew an estimated 2.5 million viewers (the US has roughly 113 million television households).

This is an interesting, innovative project, and we will certainly link to the results when available. I sent an email to Republican pollster David Hill (also a weekly columnist for The Hill), partly because of his past skepticism of instant reaction surveys of debate watchers based on "panel-back surveys." Along with what he described as "the usual caveats about robo-calling and weighting procedures," he too considers this a "useful and interesting exercise." He added:

I have done this sort of advance placement calling to test advertising embedded in programming. It gives a qualitative flavor of viewer reaction that's invaluable. Let's just be careful about making blanket statements suggesting that this definitively answers the question, "Who won the debate?" But pollsters need to try new strategies like this.

To echo that thought, remember that with a single-digit audience size, the post-debate coverage will likely have far more impact on voters' preferences than the initial reaction of the debate audience. Also, the audience for a primary debates at this stage in the campaign tends to be better educated and better informed. It includes many more voters who have an initial candidate preference but may still be open to change. By focusing only on those who were initially "undecided" (18% of Republicans as reported on the just released InsiderAdvantage poll), we may miss reactions among the soft supporters of candidates who are not absolutely certain about their choice.

 

Comments
Andrew:

I don't trust Insider Advantage because it's partisan. It's owned by long time Republicans who may be biased towards one of their candidates over the others. I have no evidence to affirm that Insider Advantage, owned by Republican Matt Towery and a bunch of other Republicans, is taking sides, but the potential for bias is there. In other words, I would trust more Gallup, SurveyUSA, Cook or any other nonpartisan entity.

Republicans distort election results let alone poll numbers.

Anything performed by a Republican should be scrutinized closely.

____________________

Joe Parisi:

The up-front work is magnificent byt the devil is in the details. If the post-event questions measure silliness like "who won" the results will have little value. If they measured newly acquired knowledge and perceptions, that would be fantastic.

____________________

Joe Parisi:

The up-front work is magnificent byt the devil is in the details. If the post-event questions measure silliness like "who won" the results will have little value. If they measured newly acquired knowledge and perceptions, that would be fantastic.

____________________

Richard:

Wednesday, 28 November, 2007

Mike Huckabee won this debate hands down!

Huckabee NEEDS to be the 2008 Republican Nominee for the President of the United States of America.

No stronger statement can be made after this, perhaps the best of all the debates, where we Americans clearly heard where the Republican Presidential candidates stand on all the issues presented this evening!

Kudos to Anderson Cooper for a very well run debate. And hats off to all the U-tube participants who asked the tough questions that MUST be answered.

And it was VERY "refreshing" to watch a real debate on "real issues" between candidates who treated each other with respect.... Men of Dignity and Honor who do not bicker and fight among themselves like the Democrats have done each time they have had a televised debate.

Congratulations and thank you Gov. Mike, I support you for MY President. I hope and pray (to God) you win and will consider asking Senator John McCain to be your Vice President.

McCain has the Country at heart with his stance on National Security and on Victory in the war against terrorists!

God Bless and Protect all of our troops!

____________________

John:

I agree completely with Richard: Huckabee shone during this debate.

____________________



Post a comment




Please be patient while your comment posts - sometimes it takes a minute or two. To check your comment, please wait 60 seconds and click your browser's refresh button. Note that comments with three or more hyperlinks will be held for approval.

MAP - US, AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY, PR