Pollster.com

Articles and Analysis

 

ME: Marriage (PPP 10/16-19)


Public Policy Polling (D)
10/16-19/09; 1,130 likely voters, 2.9% margin of error
Mode: Automated
(PPP release)

Maine

Question 1 for the upcoming Maine Referendum Election reads 'Do you want to
reject the new law that lets same-sex couples marry and allows individuals and religious
groups to refuse to perform these marriages?' Do you intend to vote yes or no on Question 1,
which would undo the law that lets same sex couples marry?

48% Yes, 48% No (trend)

 

Comments
sjt22:

I know this has been discussed before and that its not really the pollsters fault, but egad is that an awful question wording.

____________________

Field Marshal:

So, if people vote no, this law will force Priests to marry gay couples?

____________________

Vert Man:

No priest or any religious figure will be forced to marry anyone. That was the point of the bill.

____________________

Xenobion:

This question reminds me of the Monty Python Joke Warfare skit that makes Nazis die of laughter. Its making my head explode.

____________________

Field Marshal:

"No priest or any religious figure will be forced to marry anyone. That was the point of the bill."

Right, so if the bill fails, then they will be forced to marry anyone?

____________________

MD22:

The "no priest or any religious figure...." language was inserted into the bill that was passed in the Maine Legislature in order to provide an exemption for private persons from the mandate requiring the State to recognize gay marriages. Repealing the law repeals the State's obligation to recognize gay marriage, not a priest's right to refuse to perform such a ceremony. The clause is dependent on the bill being law and has no independent force.

Of course even if that clause wasn't there they could probably argue that the lack of such an exemption would deprive them of their First Amendment rights....

If you're familiar with the bill, which most Mainers are by now, the language isn't problematic.

____________________

sjt22:

The bill already passed. This measure would repeal the bill.

____________________

MD22:

yes....hence the "...that was passed in the Maine Legislature..." and the "Repealing the law..."

____________________

Cyril Washbrook:

Polling questions like this should have a clarifier after the wording: i.e.

"Yes indicates opposition to same-sex marriage, while no indicates support for same-sex marriage."

... because it took me a good 30 seconds of reading it to work out what it was saying: deciphering the question over the phone would be nigh on impossible.

____________________

MancJon:

@Field Marshal

No. If the no vote wins, then it stays as it is now, which means that gay people can marry, but priests etc. can refuse to marry them.

____________________



Post a comment


Please be patient while your comment posts - sometimes it takes a minute or two. To check your comment, please wait 60 seconds and click your browser's refresh button. Note that comments with three or more hyperlinks will be held for approval.