PA: 2010 Sen, Gov (F&M 3/15-21)
Emily Swanson | March 24, 2010
Topics: poll
Franklin & Marshall
3/15-21/10; 964 Registered voters, 3.2% margin of error
483 Democrats, 4.5% margin of error
353 Republicans, 5.2% margin of error
Mode: Live telephone interviews
(F&M release)
Pennsylvania
2010 Senate: Democratic Primary
32% Specter, 12% Sestak (chart)
2010 Senate: Republican Primary
30% Toomey, 4% Luksik
2010 Senate: General Election
33% Toomey, 29% Specter (chart)
27% Toomey, 19% Sestak (chart)
2010 Governor: Democratic Primary
11% Onorato, 7% Wagner, 5% Hoeffel, 4% Williams (chart)
2010 Governor: Republican Primary
28% Corbett, 4% Rohrer
Favorable / Unfavorable
Ed Rendell: 41 / 42 (chart)
Arlen Specter: 30 / 45 (chart)
Bob Casey: 33 / 21 (chart)
Barack Obama: 42 / 46 (chart)
Joe Sestak: 11 / 6
Pat Toomey: 18 / 10
Tom Corbett: 22 / 7
By Emily Swanson | March 24, 2010 8:58 AM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)
Comments
Seriously, I hate F&M most of the time. Push the "undecided" folks a little bit! I mean 33/29 in the general? Come on. I really, REALLY doubt almost 40% of the electorate is undecided in a Toomey/Specter race.
Posted on March 24, 2010 9:24 AM
What fun it must be to be a voter in Pennsylvania...having to choose between a shameless political opportunist, a self-important gasbag who's been in Congress for only a couple years, and a right-wing extremist. Fun times.
Posted on March 24, 2010 5:45 PM
Yes we have such a choice here. I guess to me it's a lesser of two evils. Still voting for Specter or Sestak over Toomey anyway. We just rid this state of a right wing nut job. Don't want another one. I won a free dinner over that one. Somebody bet me that Santorum would win. It was a huge democratic wave in 2006 plus some of the things that Santorum said from 2000-2006 didn't play well in this state especially the comment about working mothers and negative comments about gay people.
Posted on March 25, 2010 10:20 AM
Post a comment