Pollster.com

Articles and Analysis

 

POLL: MSNBC/McClatchy SC Primary


A new McClathy/MSNBC/Mason-Dixon South Carolina survey (results PDF, conducted 1/22 through 1/23) finds:

  • 400 Likely Democratic Primary Voters (± 5%)

    38 Obama
    30 Clinton
    19 Edwards
    0 Kucinich
    13 undecided

 

Comments
Terrond:

hmmm, maybe not a double digit obama win as we may be led to believe.

____________________

Anonymous:

Maybe not an Obama win at all. If Nevada is any indication, Edwards' 19% won't hold up because when voters actually go to the polls they won't think he can realistically win. Lets say Edwards drops from 19% to 12%, and Hillary gets 5% of that (a lot of Edwards support in SC is white male not flaming liberal) That would put it at Obama 40% Hillary 35% and Edwards 12%.

Now you have 13% undecided, a high number this late in the game. Actual voters skew older and skew female, both demographics favoring Hillary. Hillary scores two to one on the undecided vote and Obama drops a point somewhere and she wins. It is not out of the question.

____________________

Anonymous:

A repeat of NH in SC for Clinton?

____________________

Adam:

"Maybe not an Obama win at all" ????

I'll go ahead and save you the suspense -- Obama will win. The question is by how much.

____________________

RS:

The poll shows the African-American vote as 59-25 Obama-Clinton, which is lower for Obama than other surveys which say ~70%.
Among whites: Edwards 40%, Clinton 35%, Obama 10%.
If this poll is backed up by others (excluding the Clemson U survey!), then both Clinton and Obama have reason to be worried, no?
Though for Obama, other states may not be as racially divided as SC., and for Clinton, Edwards may not get as much support elsewhere.

____________________

Joshua Bradshaw:

Interesting she is closing the gap. as to the question as to whether she can win I would still say that it is still pretty safe to assume and obama win, but lets not forget NH. I do thing that it is interesting that the gap has closed and not widened. Maybe this will be a close race, and if it is will it hurt Obama. I think that a lose here would seriously hurt obama especially with all the build up by the media saying that it is essentially preordained. If Hillary were to by all the luck in the world win here i think that it may critically damage obamas campaign

____________________

KS:

Hillary will win hands down. Just like in other states, most undecided voters will go for Hillary in the last minute. Tomorrow's poll will be the most critical. If Obama cannot get the undecided voters to maintain at least a 15 point lead. He can forget about this race.

____________________

Anonymous:

Joshua, I disagree with your assertion that Clinton is "closing the gap". The last Mason Dixon poll had Obama up by 9%. Now the lead is 8%, which due to margin of error is insignificant.

You may have been referring to Obama's lead in this poll compared to other polls conducted by different pollsters, but this would be unfair, due to differences in methodology.

____________________

BDM:

Surbey USA pOLL JAN 22-23
oBAMA 45
cLINTON 29
eDWATDS 22

rcp Avg 12.2 Obama

____________________

joshua D. Bradshaw:

I was referring to the polls in general that i have seen. I am not an expert on polling, but i do know that in general I have seen him with double digit lead. however you do have a good point in the methodology so I will simply state from what i have seen in the polls hillary is getting closer.

____________________

s.b.:

Last night according to Zogby Obama's lead had shrunk to 5%.

I have been predicting since the market collapse on Monday that Clinton will win SC.

It will absolutely be a combination of NH and NEV. Obama's numbers are reported solidly, but Clinton's are underreported and Edwards support will collapse at the ballot box.

She was within striking distance last night, with two more days to go. I think she is going to take SC.

____________________

Russ:

Take a good look at all the polls.
Most have 4-5% margins of error.
Most have 10-15% undecideds.
Most have 10-30% may change minds.

In IA Clinton and Obama were only 3% apart before 2nd choice selections(a poor way to elect people btw)
In NH they were only 2% apart
And in both cases late deciders or changers were nearly 30%

What does all this mean? I think it means it is up in the air and the last 24 hours counts more than ever before.

____________________



Post a comment




Please be patient while your comment posts - sometimes it takes a minute or two. To check your comment, please wait 60 seconds and click your browser's refresh button. Note that comments with three or more hyperlinks will be held for approval.

MAP - US, AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY, PR