<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Pollster.com Kristen Soltis</title>
      <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:43:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.1</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>FL Senate: Charlie&apos;s Comeback (and how he could be stopped)</title>
         <author>ksoltis&#64;winstongroup&#46;net (Kristen Soltis)</author>
         <description>by Kristen Soltis<![CDATA[<p>If there is only one person in the world for whom the oil spill disaster in the Gulf is a blessing in disguise, that man is Charlie Crist.</p>

<p>From photos of the Governor surveying the spill to soundbites of him demanding full compensation for Florida's spill related damages, Crist's handling of the spill has offered him the chance to look like a leader, above politics, fighting for Florida.</p>

<p>But his favorables, according to <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1297.xml?ReleaseID=1461">Quinnipiac's June 9th survey</a>, haven't changed dramatically from the more difficult days of early 2010 and late 2009.  His current job approval, at 57%, is lower than it was in October 2009 when Rubio's insurgency was underway.  His favorables today are lower than the October poll as well, currently at 52%.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, Marco Rubio has struggled to pivot out of primary mode and into a general.  The shift from running as "the true conservative" to a general election candidate will not be an easy one, and it becomes more and more critical with each tough poll that the Rubio campaign make that transition and begin to build his case to an audience beyond Tea Parties and local GOP groups.</p>

<p>There are a number of things going in Crist's favor - but don't count Rubio out.  Five months is an eternity in politics.  Looking at the recent polls and exit polling data going back to 1994, there are a variety of factors that will keep this race interesting through November.</p>

<p><strong>1)Florida's unemployment rate is the fifth highest in the nation at 11.7%.</strong>  There's an anecdote my colleagues and I have been using recently to describe the current political environment.  Imagine a run-down house on that is on fire.  Sure, the windows need repair, the house could use a coat of paint, the lawn needs to be cut.  But until you put out the fire, the rest of that is irrelevant.  The fire in politics today is the unemployment rate; until jobs come back to Florida, everything else is a distraction.  When you can't drive down a suburban street without seeing foreclosure signs, voters have bigger issues they are voting on than whether or not former party chair Jim Greer had an illegal consulting arrangement with the Florida GOP.  The temptation will be high for candidates to get into discussions about party credit card statements and backroom deals but things in Florida are very serious, and voters will respond to the candidates that take the economic crisis seriously.  </p>

<p><strong>2) Around one out of four voters in 2010 in Florida is likely to be independent. </strong> In the 2006 election, 24% of voters in the Governor's race were independent - a number that jumped to 29% in the Presidential race in 2008, in congruence with the nationwide trend of a small bump in independents.  Capturing these voters is key.  Currently, Crist is winning 51% of independent voters according to the June 9 Quinnipiac poll.  This is not particularly surprising - both Meek and Rubio have been fighting for their partisan supporters - but if Crist continues to sustain a majority of the independent vote, he will be incredibly formidable heading into November.</p>

<p><strong>3) As a result, Rubio must improve his brand with independents</strong>.  Republicans know Marco Rubio.  They love Marco Rubio.  Only a quarter haven't formed an opinion about him, and only 11% don't like him. When it comes to locking down his side, he's good.  His bigger problem comes from independents, where his fav/unfav is roughly even at 31-30.  He absolutely needs to have favorables that are over 50% among independents in order to be competitive with Crist.</p>

<p><strong>4) Kendrick Meek still doesn't have a statewide brand, and if he develops one, he will slightly erode Crist's share of the vote.</strong>  Crist currently pulls in a whopping 37% of Democratic voters.  I believe this has a lot to do with the fact that 69% of voters, including 59% of Democrats, say they haven't heard enough about Meek to form an opinion.  As the election proceeds and all candidates hit the airwaves one can expect Crist's advantage to erode.  These days, a candidate can build a brand almost overnight - consider that Rick Scott came out of nowhere and now boasts 53% of Florida voters who have an opinion about him.  Meek may not be armed with the same kind of war chest, but by election day it is highly unlikely that Meek will still be an unknown to 7 out of 10 voters.</p>

<p><strong>5) Painting Crist as an opportunist is not enough - people think<em> everyone does what's popular</em></strong>.  The conventional wisdom is that if Rubio pulls down Crist's favorables and brands Crist as a political opportunist, he can gain ground.  The Quinnipiac poll showed that almost half of Florida voters (48%) think Crist makes decisions based on "what's popular" - a charge they also believe about Marco Rubio (42%). When the question is asked generally about "most public officials", 74% say they usually do what is popular.  Fighting the battle over whether or not Crist is "principled" isn't fighting a battle on which Rubio has some major advantage in the general electorate.  Furthermore, it's not as if Florida voters didn't associate Crist's defection from the GOP with ulterior motives - 60% said he left the Republican party because he couldn't win the primary, including 57% of independents.   Voters aren't naïve on this point.  If Rubio spends five months beating up on Crist as an opportunist and neglecting to build his own favorables among independents, it's not likely to be as productive as he'd like.  </p>

<p>Most folks I talk to say that in order for Rubio to have a fighting chance against Crist, he needs to bring down Crist's favorables.  Of course, that strategy might yield a slight bump in standing, but I don't believe it is nearly enough to win.  Voters already assume politicians do what they need to do to get elected.  They already assume Crist has made politically motivated moves in this race.  And they vote for him anyways.  The problem isn't Crist's favorables, the problem is Rubio's neutral brand image among independents.  And the way for Rubio, Crist, or Meek (or any candidate in any race, for that matter) to build that brand is to become the leader on the issue of the economy and jobs.  </p>

<p>Crist may be getting a break in the press with his handling of the oil spill.  But the ultimate impact of the oil spill is more than environmental, it is economic.  If tourism dollars start leaving the state and the economic situation grows more dire, the primacy of the economy in this and all races will become even greater. In January 2007 when Crist was sworn into office, Florida's unemployment rate was 3.5%. Besides March 2007, <em>every month that Charlie Crist has been Governor, <a href="http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LASST12000003">Florida's unemployment rate</a> has gotten worse. </em> Even the national unemployment rate doesn't have a trend as dramatically consistent as that, and even though the <a href="http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LNS14000000">national rate has levelled off</a>, Florida's keeps getting worse.</p>

<p>If Rubio wants to take Crist head on, he should - but with economic policy contrasts that demonstrate both how Crist failed to ameliorate the jobs situation and with how Rubio would propose to fix the problem.   Rubio rose to fame as the "ideas" man in Tallahassee, and it is that same focus on "ideas" that can be his ticket to Washington in November.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/fl_senate_charlies_comeback_an.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/fl_senate_charlies_comeback_an.php</guid>
         <category>2010</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:21:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>AAPOR 2010: Thoughts from a First-Time Attendee</title>
         <author>ksoltis&#64;winstongroup&#46;net (Kristen Soltis)</author>
         <description>by Kristen Soltis<![CDATA[<p>Last week, I had the opportunity to attend the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research.  The conference featured presentations from private sector, government, and academic researchers about their methods and findings, in addition to the release of reports by two AAPOR task forces - one on online panels, one on cell-phone surveying. </p>

<p>On the whole, I had a phenomenal experience. I truly enjoyed the spirit of collaboration as attendees and presenters shared best practices and supported each other's research. &nbsp;I had an opportunity to meet an impressive group of established public opinion researchers, and also got to meet many young students and professionals who are doing fascinating work. (I now believe that pollsters are excellent conversationalists precisely because they're so good at asking questions.)</p><p>I think that one of the great benefits of attending AAPOR came in seeing how research is conducted by those in other industries. &nbsp;For example, political pollsters deal with a variety of pressures that are lessened in academic research: the speed of data production, the need to insert your findings into the conversation quickly, as well as client demands and cost pressures. &nbsp;While a major academic study may consume years of a doctoral candidate's life, a campaign poll typically needs rapid turnaround and subsequent immediate release in order to remain "fresh." &nbsp;A campaign rarely if ever has time to improve its coverage and conduct in-person face-to-face interviews of populations missed by land-line and cell-phone surveys, for instance. Weeks or months of post-stratification are a luxury not afforded to those in the world of campaign polling. &nbsp;</p><p>At AAPOR, you get exposure to "the ideal" - projects refined by the most advanced and rigorous techniques, exploring the toughest challenges of sampling, processing and analysis that the survey research field faces. &nbsp;It highlights ways to improve your methods, regardless of field, and helps a researcher facing time and cost pressures make informed decisions about what is critical to producing useful data. &nbsp;And for a political pollster, AAPOR is a great time to focus on these issues exclusively, away from discussion about whose clients won more races or who got which race predictions closest.</p><p>There was one thing that surprised me a bit about the AAPOR conference, and I'd love to hear comments on this from those who have been to the conference before or who have been involved in the organization more deeply. &nbsp;Essentially, if AAPOR is the "American Association for Public Opinion Research," one might logically assume the conference would devote a substantial portion of time to the <i>findings</i>&nbsp;of public opinion research in addition to the <i>methods</i>&nbsp;of collecting data. &nbsp;</p><p>A great example of a panel that balanced these two was the Gary Langer/Matthew Warshaw presentation about ABC News' "Where Things Stand" research in Afghanistan. &nbsp;I walked away with a greater understanding of how to conduct research in the most incredibly challenging circumstances, but I also learned what the people of Afghanistan think about the future of their nation.</p><p>However, the vast majority of content from the conference was about the process of social science research. In some cases, it was not necessarily even about opinion research in the strictest sense of the word "opinion", but rather the collection of demographics. &nbsp;This is understandable, given that at a professional conference, everyone is trying to figure out how to do what they do <i>better</i>, but I felt there was a very narrow focus on the methods of research and less attention paid to what we're finding. &nbsp;</p><p>Why do we conduct opinion research in the first place? We do it to learn about certain groups of people and audiences. &nbsp;Developing a research methodology that perfectly captures cell-only populations is as useful as the research findings it generates. &nbsp;So what are we finding?&nbsp;Opinion research conducted by another organization about, say, shifting attitudes in America about the media, have a great deal of application to my work as a political pollster, even if that research presentation does not impact the methods of how I do my work in the future.</p><p>With the wealth of knowledge possessed by the various professional and academic organizations in AAPOR, it would be great to see more panels highlighting the findings of public opinion professionals.</p><p>In the end, I think it is critical that more political pollsters take the opportunity to focus on their methods in order to create the highest quality data. We often measure political pollsters by the accuracy of their results and how often their numbers are "on the money" when final ballots counts are in. A conference like AAPOR gives researchers the tools to make sure they are <i>right</i>&nbsp;rather than <i>lucky</i>. There is a great deal that political polling professionals can learn from their counterparts in other industries and I feel very thankful that I had the opportunity to attend this conference and learn from their experiences.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/aapor_2010_thoughts_from_a_fir.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/aapor_2010_thoughts_from_a_fir.php</guid>
         <category>AAPOR</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>AAPOR 2010: Courtney Kennedy</title>
         <author>ksoltis&#64;winstongroup&#46;net (Kristen Soltis)</author>
         <description>by Kristen Soltis<![CDATA[<p>Some of the items I was most interested in learning about at AAPOR this year were the findings of the task force on cell phone survey research.  Given my particular interest in understanding young voters, I am particularly concerned about the lack of coverage among that group with landline-only research.  The task force presented a number of findings that acknowledged the increased costs and challenges of cell-phone sampling  (cognitive shortcutting, potential risks to respondent safety, response rates, etc.)  Courtney Kennedy's award-winning student paper on whether or not cell phone respondents employ cognitive shortcuts when responding to surveys. Essentially, are respondents paying attention and giving us good data? As the recipient of the Seymour Sudman student paper award, Kennedy tackled a critical question in understanding how to conduct better research using this sample frame.  I was lucky enough to be able to ask her about her work for a moment at the AAPOR conference this weekend in Chicago.<br />
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/koLSxMlMKWM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/koLSxMlMKWM&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/aapor_2010_courtney_kennedy.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/aapor_2010_courtney_kennedy.php</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 21:52:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>AAPOR 2010: Pew&apos;s Jocelyn Kiley</title>
         <author>ksoltis&#64;winstongroup&#46;net (Kristen Soltis)</author>
         <description>by Kristen Soltis<![CDATA[<p>One of the things I loved most about the AAPOR conference was the opportunity to learn from pollsters of different disciplines.  The lessons one organization learns about how to reach a unique population are often useful to researchers of all varieties.  In this case, Pew presented its findings about how best to reach Hispanics in general public opinion surveys.  From issues in language and translation to interviewer hand-offs to the prevalence of cell phone use, Pew's findings highlighted the challenges in ensuring Hispanics are properly represented in survey research.  For campaign pollsters, particularly those operating in states with a high proportion of Hispanic voters, knowing how to get a representative snapshot is becoming more and more critical to monitoring political attitudes.  I had a chance to chat with Jocelyn Kiley about the research and its importance to political polling.<br />
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2YzR_O9wxxY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2YzR_O9wxxY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/aapor_2010_pews_jocelyn_kiley.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/aapor_2010_pews_jocelyn_kiley.php</guid>
         <category>AAPOR</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 21:44:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>AAPOR 2010: Chris Wilson and Bryon Allen</title>
         <author>ksoltis&#64;winstongroup&#46;net (Kristen Soltis)</author>
         <description>by Kristen Soltis<![CDATA[<p>While AAPOR's panels are predominantly comprised of academics and professional non-partisan researchers, it was nice to run into a handful of political pollsters who had presentations as well.  Chris Wilson and Bryon Allen from Wilson Research Strategies dug into the ANES data to answer a basic question: what matters more, persuasion or turnout?  Is it more critical to move the middle or to energize your base?  Their research points to persuasion as key.  I pulled them aside for a moment before their panel to find out about their research.<br />
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MjYKVblJtdY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MjYKVblJtdY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/aapor_2010_chris_wilson_and_br.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/aapor_2010_chris_wilson_and_br.php</guid>
         <category>AAPOR</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 21:35:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
