Pollster.com

Articles and Analysis

 

Will the GOP brand make a difference in November?

Topics: Democrats , Favorable Ratings , GOP , Republican Party

Today's New York Times includes a front-page story on a new poll headlined "Poll Suggests Opportunities for Both Parties". In the lede, Jeff Zeleny and Megan Thee-Brenan note the signs pointing to a Republican sweep, but note "while voters rate the performance of Democrats negatively, they view Republicans as even worse, providing a potential opening for Democrats":

Republicans are heading into the general election phase of the midterm campaign backed by two powerful currents: the highest proportion of voters in two decades say it is time for their own member of Congress to be replaced, and Americans are expressing widespread dissatisfaction with President Obama's leadership.

But the latest New York Times/CBS News poll also finds that while voters rate the performance of Democrats negatively, they view Republicans as even worse, providing a potential opening for Democrats to make a last-ditch case for keeping their hold on power.

Is this really true? Will the poor state of the GOP brand limit the party's gains in November? I made this argument months ago (see here, here, and here), but the Republican party's image hasn't prevented it from taking a substantial lead in the generic ballot.

To review the evidence about where the GOP brand stands relative to the opposition party in previous midterm elections, let me update my post from last October. Here's a bar chart of each party's net favorable ratings (% favorable - % unfavorable) for the most comparable available CBS poll from midterm elections between 1990 and 2010*:

Cbspartyfaves

The GOP's net favorability ratings relative to Democrats are still worse than any opposition party in the previous five midterm elections (the closest comparison is 1998, when Republicans were seeking to remove Bill Clinton from office).

In the past, the opposition party's (dis)advantage in net favorability relative to the president's party has been relatively highly correlated (r=.71) with changes in the number of House seats in midterm elections. However, a simple linear fit shows a totally implausible result for 2010 (Republicans losing 17 seats):

Favseats

I'm not buying it. At this point, every other major factor (the high number of seats Democrats currently hold, the fact that it's a midterm election, and the generic ballot) points toward big GOP gains -- the predicted result of most House forecasting models. Unfortunately for Democrats, midterm elections are a referendum, not a choice.

Update 9/17 9:09 AM: Barry Pump points out that the net favorability advantage appears to be a better predictor in the last five midterms than the generic ballot. It's very hard to say what will happen. As he points out, this is uncharted territory:

First, we've never been in a situation until now -- as far as we have data to show it -- where both parties were disliked but one party was disliked far more than another. We've also never been in a situation where the difference between the favorability rankings of the two parties was as great as it is now. (That's from the first graph.)

Second, we've yet to be in a situation until now -- as far as we have data to show it -- where the favorability rankings of the two parties were so discordant with the generic ballot.

* I focus on net favorables rather than net approval of the parties in Congress (which Zeleny and Thee-Brenan cite) because the available data is more comprehensive and the measure is less confounded with feelings about Congress as an institution.

[Cross-posted to brendan-nyhan.com and Huffington Post]

 

Comments

Politics is a dirty business!

____________________

Aaron_in_TX:

It seems unprecedented for both parties to have negative ratings. I wonder if we could go back futher than 1990 and discover if that has ever happened before?

I've been saying for a while the net negative favorability for republicans will have unpredictable results.

____________________

What analysts are missing about the party approval number is that many Tea Party folks disapprove of the GOP party, while nearly all of them plan to vote for the GOP candidates they are nominating across the country. In other words, the Tea Party is engaged in a hostile takeover of the GOP through the nomination process.

This is how you have low approval numbers for the Party, while having the GOP taking historic leads in the generic and individual polling.

____________________

CompCon:

Bingo! You hit the nail right on the head, Bart.

The fact that republicans have lower approvals in almost every poll but more people are planning to vote for them than democrats shows the depth of disgust with all government. Since the democrats control the white house, congress, and the senate - they are going to feel the wrath of the electorate the most.

I disapprove of democrats. I disapprove of republicans. But there is no chance in hell I would vote for a democrat no matter how bad the republican is. The worst republican in the world is still better than the best democrat in the world.

____________________

AlanSnipes:

Compcon: I agree with you in reverse I haven't voted for a Republican for ANY office in 26 years.

____________________

s.b.:

CBS poll enough said.

____________________

AlanSnipes:

That's right sb, you don't like CBS so their poll is wrong. Typical right wing logic.

____________________

JMSTiger:

@ Bart DePalma

I agree 100%. In fact, I was about to make the same point until I read your comment. That is what these mainstream media types are missing. The Tea Party people strongly dislike the Republican Party of 2001 to the present. They are sick of the establishment and until those types are thrown out, they will tell pollsters how little they think of the Republican Party. Those that have favorable opinions of the current GOP are the country club, establishment types or the hyper-partisans whose faith is in the party, not conservatism. The New York Times and CBS News making a big deal of this little piece of data is just more whistling past the graveyard. November 2nd will be an earthquake.

____________________



Post a comment




Please be patient while your comment posts - sometimes it takes a minute or two. To check your comment, please wait 60 seconds and click your browser's refresh button. Note that comments with three or more hyperlinks will be held for approval.

MAP - US, AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY, PR