November 02, 2006
A few quick updates on the poll data we track on races for the House of Representatives:
First, as of last night, we now have charts available for all 84 House districts for which we currently have polling data. Clicking on a link for any House district on our House map and national summary table now takes you directly to the chart for that race, just like the links on our Senate and Governor maps. This latest update means that any our 84 House district charts,** like the one from can be embedded on your blog or website using the new "embed Chart feature" (see yesterday's post for details).
Second, an apology for the slightly slower pace of blog posts over the last 48 hours or so as we worked to get these new upgrades and features up and running. I have also been spent a lot of time the last few days crunching my "big-spreadsheet-o'House" and will have a more in-depth review of the available polling data later today. For those who cannot wait, you can find the abridged version in our Slate House Election Scorecard updates on Tuesday and Wednesday.
Finally, a quick update on a bit of anecdotal evidence I discussed last Saturday. There is one source of polling largely out of public view - the internal polls conducted by the campaigns and party committees. Some of these get released, but typically only when they show good news for that particular campaign. So one indirect measure of where things stand is which side is releasing more of its internal polling, and by that measure the Democrats are a lot more confident: Since Labor Day, Democrats have released 54 internal polls for House candidates logged into our Pollster.com database, Republicans have released only 13. And that confidence has not abated in the last two weeks. Since October 15, Democrats have released 21 internal polls, Republicans only 2.
**Unfortunately, many of the House races have only a handful of polls. As of this morning, roughly half of the districts in our database have three or fewer polls, and that will make for a very sparse looking chart. Keep in mind that the trend line represents the average of the last 5 (or fewer) polls at any given point in time. So for the first few polls in the series, the lines may draw in ways that seem a little confusing.
-- Mark Blumenthal
November 02, 2006 in The 2006 Race
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.pollster.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.fcgi/3146.
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yes, We Have House Charts!:
Comments
Matt Wos:
this is awesome. Thank you so much for this site!
Posted on November 2, 2006 7:55 PM
Shaun Bowler:
Just echoing Matt Wos.... you and Charles are doing a fantastic job with this site and Pol Arithmetik. This really is informative work. Thank you both.
Posted on November 3, 2006 11:19 AM
Post a comment
Gov General Election:
Indiana
Montana
New Hampshire
North Carolina
North Dakota
Utah
Washington
Sen General Election:
Alabama
Alaska
Colorado
Idaho
Illinois
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi (A)
Mississippi (Special)
Nebraska
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
North Carolina
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Texas
Virginia
2008 POLL DATA
Pres General Election:
National
National 4-way
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
All 08 GE Match-ups
All 08 Primaries
PUBLIC POLLSTERS
ABC News
AP-IPSOS
CBS News
Democracy Corps (D)
Diageo/Hotline Poll
Economist/YouGov
EPIC/MRA
The Field Poll
FOX News
GWU/Battleground
Gallup
Harris Interactive
IBD/TIPP
ICR - International Communications Research
LA Times/Bloomberg
Mason Dixon Polling and Research
Marist Poll
Market Shares Corporation
Mitchell Interactive
NBC/Wall Street Journal
New York Times
Opinion Research Corporation
Pew Research Center
Polimetrix
Princeton Survey Research Associates International
Public Agenda
Public Policy Polling
Quinnipiac University Poll
Rasmussen Reports
Selzer & Company
Suffolk University Political Research Center
Survey USA
Time/SRBI
Washington Post
World Public Opinion
Zogby International
POLL BLOGS AND SITES
Political Arithmetik
Crosstabs.org
The Polling Report
Electoral-Vote.com
R. Chung's Graphics
Prof. Wang's State Poll Meta-Analysis
Prof. Pollkatz Pool of Polls
Slate: Election Scorecard
Public Opinion Pros
Frank Newport: Gallup Guru
Carl Bialik: The Numbers Guy
Poll Positions: Kathy Frankovic
The Numbers: Gary Langer
Washington Post: Behind the Numbers
SURVEY RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS
American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR)
The National Council on Public Polls (NCPP)
Council of American Survey Research Organizations (CASRO)
The World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR)
The Council for Marketing and Opinion Research (CMOR)
Marketing Research Association
ARCHIVES
July 13, 2008 - July 19, 2008
July 6, 2008 - July 12, 2008
June 29, 2008 - July 5, 2008
June 22, 2008 - June 28, 2008
June 15, 2008 - June 21, 2008
June 8, 2008 - June 14, 2008
June 1, 2008 - June 7, 2008
May 25, 2008 - May 31, 2008
May 18, 2008 - May 24, 2008
May 11, 2008 - May 17, 2008
All pollster.com archives
MysteryPollster.com archives






Dwight McCabe:
Thank you for your hard work on collecting and mapping all these polls, plus educating everyone on the nuances of reading polls.
However, I do question the use of averages when polls are so sparse and you include polls six months old or more in your average. Of course we all know that races can change dramatically after Labor Day. Including a poll showing the incumbent ahead by 20 points in June, when the challenger has low name recognition, can skew the average when September and October polls usually show a much closer race or even has the challenger ahead by a few points.
Despite limited polling data points, I'd throw out any polls more than, say, two months old from your average or trend lines.
Posted on November 2, 2006 1:13 PM