FAQ: Table of Contents
- Why are polls showing contradictory results?
- What does the "margin of error" mean?
- How do pollsters select "likely voters?"
- Should pollsters weight by party identification?
- Do undecided voters break for the challenger?
- Are polls missing people with mobile phones?
- Can polls tell who won a debate?
- Questions about Exit Polls
- Other questions
Why are polls showing contradictory results?
In a sense, every post on this site seeks to answer the question of why polls seem contradictory. A good place to start is with the following three posts on the random variation inherent in all sample surveys and what a consumer can do to minimize it (each post has a link at the end connecting to the next post in the series):
Beyond that, much of the variation in political polls comes from the way the pollster defines a "likely voter.” These two questions on the FAQ list deal with two issues that explain much of the systematic variation between polls:
Finally, at the most basic level, political campaign polls typically seek to accomplish three tasks. Click on any of these links to display short excerpts of all of the posts in the category in reverse chronological order (most recent first):
- Contacting a random sample of adults
- Selecting a pool of potential or likely voters
- Interpreting the results
What does the "margin of error" mean?
A good place to start is with the following three posts on the random variation inherent in all sample surveys and what a consumer can do to minimize it (each post has a link at the end connecting to the next post in the series):
Also, click on this link to display short excerpts of all of the posts concerning sampling error in reverse chronological order (most recent first).
How do pollsters select "likely voters?"
I have done a lot of posting on this topic. If you want a very thorough reading, start with Part I and continue through the series. You might also want to skip to Part VIII, which is something of a guide to the likely voter models used by all the major polling organizations:
- The Why & How of Likely Voters - Part I
- The Why & How of Likely Voters - Part II
- The Why & How of Likely Voters - Part III
- Likely Voters IV - The Gallup Model
- Likely Voters V: More Gallup
- Likely Voters VI: Still More on Gallup
- Likely Voters VII: CBS/NYT
- Likely Voters VIII: Users Guide to Everybody Else
Also,you can click on this link to display short excerpts of all of the posts concerning likely voters in reverse chronological order (most recent first).
Should pollsters weight by party identification?
The debate over whether pollsters should statistically adjust (or weight) their samples by party identification has been heated during campaign 2004. Here is a list of sequence of posts that covered this topic exhaustively:
- Weighting by Party
- More on Party ID
- Why & How Pollsters Weight, Part I
- Why & How Pollsters Weight, Part II
- Why & How Pollsters Weight, Part III
- Why & How Pollsters Weight, Part IV
It is worth noting that the debate about weighting by party is really a part of a larger debate also raging in 2004 about how pollsters define likely voters – click this link for more information.
Finally, click on this link to display short excerpts of all of the posts concerning weighting by party in reverse chronological order (most recent first).
Do undecided voters break for the challenger?
When pollsters interpret results for a race involving an incumbent, pollsters have typically applied the rule that incumbents rarely get a higher percentage in the election than they receive in polls, and that voters still undecided on the very last poll tend to "break" disproportionately for the challenger.
I wrote quite a bit on the incumbent rule before the 2004 election, but then the results at the presidential level defied the rule. I considered some of the reasons for what appears to be a recent weakening of the incumbent "rule" in this post in August, 2006.
These two posts from 2004 best explained the "incumbent rule:
Also, click on this link to display a listing of all posts concerning the incumbent rule on Pollster.com (in reverse chronological order - most recent first). This link display posts on the incumbent rule from the blog MysteryPollster.
Are polls missing people with mobile phones?
These two posts from 2004 address the issue of how households with cell phones but no "landline" service can affect telephone surveys:
Can polls tell who won a debate?
Start with these two posts on how instant polls and focus group aim to evaluate how candidates faired in a debate:
For more commentary, click on this link, or the link for the "debates" category, for a list of short excerpts of all of the posts on polls aimed at measuring reaction to the presidential debates. They will appear in reverse chronological order (most recent first).
Questions about Exit Polls
Since the election, I have written quite a bit on exit polls. Although I have learned a lot in that process, my Election Day summary of "what you need to know" about exit polls still holds up well and is a good place to start if you are new to this site.
Here is the complete list of questions:
- What is the difference between "partial" and "final" exit polls? Covers which tabulations were "corrected" to match the actual count and which were not.
- Where can I find the "uncorrected," just-before-poll closing exit poll tabulations?
- Where can I find official methodological information about exit polls?
- What is the margin of error for exit polls?
- Were the exit polls really "wrong?"
- Why were exit polls in Germany & Utah so accurate?
- Have the exit polls been wrong before?
- If not random error, why were they "wrong?"
- So if exit polls have so much error, why do them?
- I heard the exit poll estimates for Hispanic voters have been revised -- is that true?
- What is MP's reaction to the paper, "The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," by Steven Freeman? (This post dicusses his first draft at length, this post has Freeman's response).
You can also see a summary of all posts about exit polls (in reverse chronological order) by clicking this link.
Other questions
More frequently asked questions - click the link for answers:
- Can polls tell who won a debate?
- Why do retrospective questions about the 2000 race show Bush beating Gore?
- Why are there "Democratic pollsters" and "Republican pollsters?" Does their partisanship bias the results?
- Are polls missing voters in the military serving out of the country?
- Why blog about polling?
More to come…
08 STATEWIDE PRIMARIES
US
Dem,
Rep
Upcoming
West Virginia (5/13)
Kentucky (5/20)
Oregon (5/20)
Puerto Rico (6/1)
Montana (6/3)
South Dakota (6/3)
2008 POLL DATA
Pres General Election:
McCain vs
US: Clinton, Obama
AL: Clinton, Obama
AK: Clinton, Obama
AZ: Clinton, Obama
AR: Clinton, Obama
CA: Clinton, Obama
CO: Clinton, Obama
CT: Clinton, Obama
DE: Clinton, Obama
FL: Clinton, Obama
GA: Clinton, Obama
IN: Clinton, Obama
IA: Clinton, Obama
ME: Clinton, Obama
MA: Clinton, Obama
MI: Clinton, Obama
MN: Clinton, Obama
MO: Clinton, Obama
NV: Clinton, Obama
NH: Clinton, Obama
NJ: Clinton, Obama
NM: Clinton, Obama
NY: Clinton, Obama
NC: Clinton, Obama
OH: Clinton, Obama
OR: Clinton, Obama
PA: Clinton, Obama
TX: Clinton, Obama
VA: Clinton, Obama
WA: Clinton, Obama
WV: Clinton, Obama
WI: Clinton, Obama
Sen General Election:
Alaska
Colorado
Louisiana
Maine
Minnesota
New Hampshire
New Mexico (Pearce)
New Mexico (Wilson)
North Carolina
Texas
Virginia
PUBLIC POLLSTERS
ABC News
AP-IPSOS
CBS News
Democracy Corps (D)
Diageo/Hotline Poll
Economist/YouGov
EPIC/MRA
The Field Poll
FOX News
GWU/Battleground
Gallup
Harris Interactive
IBD/TIPP
ICR - International Communications Research
LA Times/Bloomberg
Mason Dixon Polling and Research
Marist Poll
Market Shares Corporation
Mitchell Interactive
NBC/Wall Street Journal
New York Times
Opinion Research Corporation
Pew Research Center
Polimetrix
Princeton Survey Research Associates International
Public Agenda
Public Policy Polling
Quinnipiac University Poll
Rasmussen Reports
Selzer & Company
Suffolk University Political Research Center
Survey USA
Time/SRBI
Washington Post
World Public Opinion
Zogby International
POLL BLOGS AND SITES
Political Arithmetik
Crosstabs.org
The Polling Report
Electoral-Vote.com
R. Chung's Graphics
Prof. Wang's State Poll Meta-Analysis
Prof. Pollkatz Pool of Polls
Slate: Election Scorecard
Public Opinion Pros
Frank Newport: Gallup Guru
Carl Bialik: The Numbers Guy
Poll Positions: Kathy Frankovic
The Numbers: Gary Langer
Washington Post: Behind the Numbers
SURVEY RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS
American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR)
The National Council on Public Polls (NCPP)
Council of American Survey Research Organizations (CASRO)
The World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR)
The Council for Marketing and Opinion Research (CMOR)
Marketing Research Association
ARCHIVES
May 4, 2008 - May 10, 2008
April 27, 2008 - May 3, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
March 2, 2008 - March 8, 2008
All pollster.com archives
MysteryPollster.com archives





