<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Pollster.com All Content</title>
      <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:34:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.1</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>OH: 2010 Gov (Quinnipiac 6/26 - 7/1)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Quinnipiac<br />
6/26 - 7/1/09; 1,259 registered voters, 2.8% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1322.xml?ReleaseID=1346">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>Ohio</b></p>

<p><i>Favorable/Unfavorable</i><br />
Ted Strickland (D): 42 / 37<br />
Mike DeWine (R): 39 / 22<br />
John Kasich (R): 26 / 7<br />
Kevin Coughlin (R): 5 / 3<br />
.<br />
<i>Job Approval/Disapproval</i><br />
Gov. Strickland: 46 / 42</p>

<p><i> 2010 Governor: Republican Primary</i><br />
Kasich 35%, Dewine 32%, Coughlin 3%</p>

<p><i>2010 Governor: General Election</i><br />
Strickland 43%, Kasich 38%<br />
Strickland 41%, DeWine 40%</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/oh_2010_gov_quinnipiac_626_71.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/oh_2010_gov_quinnipiac_626_71.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:34:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>SC: Sanford Affair (SurveyUSA 7/1)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>SurveyUSA<br />
7/1/09; 500 adults, 4.1% margin of error<br />
Mode: IVR</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=77091dd5-e050-4846-af54-9b3f42e0060f">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>South Carolina</b></p>

<p><i>Based on what you know, should Governor Mark Sanford remain in office? Or resign? </i></p>

<p>28% Remain in office, 69% Resign</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/sc_sanford_affair_surveyusa_71.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/sc_sanford_affair_surveyusa_71.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:18:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Happy 4th of July &quot;Outliers&quot;</title>
         <author>mark&#64;pollster&#46;com (Mark Blumenthal)</author>
         <description>by Mark Blumenthal<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/7931.cfm">The Kaiser Family Foundation rounds up</a> polling on how to foot the bill for health care reform.</p>
<p><a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1266/polling-challenges-election-08-success-in-dealing-with">Scott Keeter and his Pew Research Center colleagues</a> review the perils of polling in election 2008.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/30/nc_controversy_reveals_perils_of_reporting_on_polls__97227.html">Stu Rothenberg reviews</a> the perils of <i>reporting</i> on polls.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124640788035376975.html#mod=rss_The_Numbers_Guy">Carl Bialik considers</a> the limitations of Benford's Law in hunting vote fraud (more <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/statistical-sleuthing-on-the-iran-election-747/">on his blog</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/06/statistical-tests-and-election-fraud.html">Andrew Gelman shares</a> his final thoughts on the Iran vote analyses.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.pos.org/2009/07/buyers%E2%80%99-remorse/">Alex Bratty sees</a> signs of Obama buyer's remorse among independents.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/677plgab.asp">Gary Andres says</a> perceptions of risks will matter more than perceived benefits in health care reform.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/06/28/tnrtv-teixeira.aspx">Ruy Teixeira argues</a> that Republicans are out of touch on health care.</p>
<p><a href="http://thehill.com/mark-mellman/opposing-clean-energy-hurts-gop-2009-06-30.html">Mark Mellman says</a> Republicans will pay for opposing clean energy.<br /></p>
<p><a href="http://thehill.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=83813&amp;Itemid=75">David Hill likes</a> contested primaries.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/28/INDL18E7FU.DTL">Ben Tulchin sees</a> Gavin Newsome gaining after Antonio Villaraigosa drops out of the CA governor's race.</p>
<p><a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/senate-republicans/poll-republicans-divided-on-whether-to-confirm-sotomayor/">Greg Sargent notes</a> Republican division on Sotomayor.</p>
<p><a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2009/07/sotomayor-polling.html">Tom Jensen thinks</a> automated surveys are picking up more Sotomayor opposition.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/obama-poll-watch-june-200_b_224424.html">Chris Weigant updates</a> his Obama Poll Watch charts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.themonkeycage.org/2009/06/are_republicans_more_likely_to.html">John Sides faults</a> Charles Blow for succumbing to an ecological fallacy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1096472.html">Haaretz reports</a> a new poll showing Hamas popularity falling among Palestinians (via <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/06/29/unhappy-with-hamas.aspx">Crowley</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://researchrants.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/adblock-never-heard-of-it/">Research Rants reminds</a> web researchers to test their surveys.</p>
<p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2009/06/census_advisory_committee_name.html?hpid=moreheadlines">Gary Locke taps</a> three Census Bureau veterans to serve as part time advisors.</p>
<p><a href="http://surveypractice.org/2009/06/29/survey-practice-june-2009-issue/">Survey Practice releases</a> its June issue -- so you can spend the long weekend catching up on the <a href="http://surveypractice.org/2009/06/29/scale-points/">optimal number of scale points</a> for attitudinal questions.</p>
<p>And an <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-borowitz/poll-majority-of-minnesot_b_223711.html">Andy Borowitz parody</a> comes disturbingly <a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/dutton_why_polling_doesnt_matc.php">close to the truth</a>.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/happy_4th_of_july_outliers.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/happy_4th_of_july_outliers.php</guid>
         <category>&quot;Outlier&quot; Posts</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:28:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>NH: 2010 Senate (UNH 6/24-7/1)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>University of New Hampshire Granite State Poll<br />
6/24-7/1/09; 558 adults, 4.4% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(<a href=http://www.unh.edu/survey-center/news/pdf/gsp2009_summer_congapp70209.pdf">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>New Hampshire</b></p>

<p><i>Favorable / Unfavorable</i><br />
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D): 50 / 36<br />
Sen. Judd Gregg (R): 53 / 24<br />
Paul Hodes (D): 32 / 23<br />
John Sununu (R): 43 / 38<br />
Charlie Bass (R): 33 / 23<br />
Kelly Ayotte (R): 45 / 8<br />
Frank Tausch (R): 5 / 4</p>

<p><i>2010 Senate</i><br />
Ayotte 39%, Hodes 35%<br />
Hodes 43%, Sununu 41%<br />
Hodes 40%, Bass 38%<br />
Hodes 45%, Tausch 25%</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/nh_2010_senate_unh_62471.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/nh_2010_senate_unh_62471.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:26:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>US: National Survey (Quinnipiac 6/23-29)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Quinnipiac<br />
6/23-29/09; 3,063 registered voters, 1.8% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1345">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>National</b></p>

<p><i>2010 House Generic Ballot</i><br />
Democrat 42%, Republican 34% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/10-us-house-genballot.php">chart</a>)</p>

<p><i>Obama Job Approval</i><br />
57% Approve, 33% Disapprove (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama.php">chart</a>)<br />
Dems: 90 / 5 (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama-dems.php">chart</a>)<br />
inds: 52 / 37 (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama-inds.php">chart</a>)<br />
Reps: 21 / 66 (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama-reps.php">chart</a>)</p>

<p>Economy: 52% Approve, 42% Disapprove (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-presobama-economy.php">chart</a>)<br />
Foreign Policy: 55% Approve, 35% Disapprove (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-presobama-foreignpolicy.php">chart</a>)</p>

<p><i>State of the Country</i><br />
39% Satisfied, 60% Dissatisfied (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/issue-sat.php">chart</a>)<br />
Economy: 8% Excellent/Good, 91% Not So Good/Poor (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/issue-econ-ep.php">chart</a>)<br />
Economy: 27% Getting Better, 29% Getting Worse (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/issue-econ-gbw.php">chart</a>)</p>

<p><i>Favorable / Unfavorable</i><br />
Obama: 58 / 30 (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/fav-obama.php">chart</a>)<br />
Democratic Party: 42 / 42<br />
Republican Party: 25 / 52</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_national_survey_quinnipiac.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_national_survey_quinnipiac.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:15:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>US: Iraq Security (Gallup 6/30)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Gallup<br />
6/30/09; 1,011 adults, 3% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/121376/Americans-Expect-Security-Iraq-Worsen-Pullout.aspx?CSTS=alert">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>National</b></p>

<p><i>What do you think will happen to the security situation in Iraq now that responsibility for providing security in Iraq's major cities and towns has been transferred form U.S forces to Iraqi security forces?</i></p>

<p>21% Get better, 58% Get worse</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_iraq_security_gallup_630.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_iraq_security_gallup_630.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:58:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Rating &quot;Obama&apos;s Health Plan&quot;</title>
         <author>mark&#64;pollster&#46;com (Mark Blumenthal)</author>
         <description>by Mark Blumenthal<![CDATA[<p>Today brings two new national poll releases featuring in-depth questions on health care reform from <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/01/health.care.poll/index.html">CNN/ORC</a> and <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1344">Quinnipiac University</a>. As always with the subject, the new releases provide many new wrinkles to consider, but for the moment I want to focus on just one.</p>
<p>The CNN/ORC poll begins with a very general measure: "From everything you have heard or read so far, do you favor or oppose Barack Obama's plan to reform health care?" They find a "slim majority" (51%) in favor, 45% opposed and 4% unsure.</p>
<p>Let's start with what is hopefully obvious: Democrats in Congress are drafting <a href="http://www.kff.org/healthreform/sidebyside.cfm">multiple proposals,</a> and the Obama administration has not specifically endorsed any of these. So a well informed respondent ought to have trouble evaluating "Obama's plan," since Obama has not yet committed to a specific plan. Even more important, very few Americans are following that debate with rapt attention. Last month's CBS/<i>New York Times</i> <a href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/images/nytint/docs/latest-new-york-times-cbs-news-poll-on-health/original.pdf">poll</a>, for example, found only 22% of Americans saying they have heard or read "a lot" about the health care reform proposals (50% said they heard or read "some," 23% not much, 5% nothing).</p>
<p>Notice that when the NBC/<i>Wall Street Journal</i> <a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/090617_NBC-WSJ_poll_Full.pdf">poll</a> asked a general question about "Obama's health care plan" last month, they offered "no opinion" as an option: "From what you have heard about Barack Obama's health care plan, do you think his plan is a good idea or a bad idea? If you do not have an opinion either way, please just say so."With that option, slightly more than a third (35%) either had no opinion or were unsure. Those with an opinion divided evenly; 33% said it was a good idea, 32% a bad idea.</p>
<p>When pollsters push as hard as CNN/ORC for an answer, a lot of the responses are going to be <i>very</i> soft, often formed on the spot and based on very superficial impressions. Nonetheless, if I were charged with conducting a benchmark survey for a candidate over the next few months, and I had room for only one question about health care reform, I would be tempted to ask a very general question about "President Obama's plan to reform health care" (though I'd strongly lean to the NBC/WSJ version that explicitly prompts for "no opinion"). &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>Yes, public opinion on health care reform is multi-faceted. Americans come to the debate with a rich set of values and attitudes about what they like and dislike about the health care system, what they would change and what they worry about changing. Most have not yet focused on the details of the legislative debate. Many never will. So questions about specific policy proposals can produce results all over the map. As Slate's Chris Beam puts in an <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2221751/">excellent summary</a> this week, "health care polling is especially variable, depending on the wording, the context, and the momentary angle of the sun."</p>
<p>But once a specific health care reform proposal comes up for a vote, members of Congress are going to be intensely interested in the bottom line perceived by their constituents: Do they generally favor or oppose the thing they are about to vote on? Right now, many Americans do not hold strong opinions about whatever they think "Barack Obama's health care plan" is or will be, but those attitudes are likely to deepen and change in the coming months.</p>
<p>In that regard, the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/01/health.care.poll/index.html">comparison</a> provided by CNN Polling Director Keating Holland is helpful:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"In September of 1993, when Bill Clinton was just starting to roll out his ill-fated health care plan, 54 percent said they supported Clinton's ideas on that issue. Today, 51 percent feel the same way about Obama's proposals," Holland said. "That indicates that Obama may have his work cut out for him in the coming months."<br /></p>
</blockquote>
<p>CNN also sent out a <a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/CNN-rel10e.pdf">release</a> this afternoon that includes the complete time series of this question from the 1993-1994 period.&nbsp; I used it to create the following chart:</p>
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/2009-07-01_CNNhealth.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.pollster.com/blogs/2009-07-01_CNNhealth.php','popup','width=518,height=405,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/2009-07-01_CNNhealth-thumb-550x430.png" alt="2009-07-01_CNNhealth.png" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="430" width="550" /></a></span>
<p>Support and opposition is roughly comparable what the CNN/USA Today/Gallup polling partnership found in early 1993, although note that their first two surveys in September 1993 came just before and just after President Clinton delivered a live, prime-time address outlining the specifics of his proposal to a joint session of Congress. Note also that the average "unsure" percentage on the 1993 surveys was 9%, slightly more than double the 4% on the survey released today. CNN's surveys are now fielded by the Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) rather than Gallup, and ORC's interviewers may be pushing slightly harder for answers than Gallup's interviewers were 16 years ago.</p>
<p>Caveats aside, this is a measure worth watching, but be careful to keep it in context: Nearly a third of Americans, when offered the option, say they have no opinion (yet) of Barack Obama's "plans to reform health care."</p>
<p><b>Update</b>: Nate Silver has <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/07/obama-has-health-care-plan.html">more</a>.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/rating_obamas_health_plan.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/rating_obamas_health_plan.php</guid>
         <category>Barack Obama</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:57:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>US: Sotomayor (Rasmussen 6/29-30)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen<br />
6/29-30/09; 1,000 likely Voters, 3% margin of error<br />
Mode: IVR</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/pt_survey_toplines/june_2009/toplines_sotomayor_june_29_30_2009">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>National</b></p>

<p><i>The United States Senate has the constitutional authority to confirm all Supreme Court nominees. Based upon what you know at this time, should the United States confirm Sonia Sotomayor as a Supreme Court Justice?</i><br />
37% Yes, 39% No</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_sotomayor_rasmussen_62930.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_sotomayor_rasmussen_62930.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:53:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>NJ: Christie 45, Corzine 39 (FDickinson 6/22-29)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Fairleigh Dickinson/Public Mind<br />
6/22-29/09; 803 Registered Voters, 3.5% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(<a href="http://publicmind.fdu.edu/30jun/">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>New Jersey</b></p>

<p><i>Job Approval</i><br />
Obama: 61% Approve, 29% Disapprove<br />
Gov. Corzine: 36 / 49</p>

<p><i>Favorable/Unfavorable</i><br />
Corzine: 31 / 54<br />
Christie: 34 / 25</p>

<p><i>2009 Governor</i><br />
Christie 45%, Corzine 39%</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/nj_christie_42_corzine_35_fdic.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/nj_christie_42_corzine_35_fdic.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:35:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Colbert&apos;s Noncensus</title>
         <author>mark&#64;pollster&#46;com (Mark Blumenthal)</author>
         <description>by Mark Blumenthal<![CDATA[<p>Too good to hold for the next "outliers" feature: Monday night's Colbert Report had a segment on the U.S. Census that even includes a reference on <a href="http:///">on-hold</a> Census director nominee Robert Groves (via <a href="http://twitter.com/AAPOR/statuses/2414298217">@AAPOR</a>). <br /></p>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<table style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245);" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="353" width="360"><tbody><tr style="background-color: rgb(229, 229, 229);" valign="middle"><td style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;"><a target="_blank" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.colbertnation.com/">The Colbert Report</a></td><td style="padding: 2px 5px 0px; text-align: right; font-weight: bold;">Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c</td></tr><tr style="height: 14px;" valign="middle"><td style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;" colspan="2"><a target="_blank" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/232269/june-29-2009/the-word---noncensus">The Word - Noncensus</a></td></tr><tr style="height: 14px; background-color: rgb(53, 53, 53);" valign="middle"><td colspan="2" style="padding: 2px 5px 0px; overflow: hidden; width: 360px; text-align: right;"><a target="_blank" style="color: rgb(150, 222, 255); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.colbertnation.com/">www.colbertnation.com</a></td></tr><tr valign="middle"><td style="padding: 0px;" colspan="2"><embed style="display: block;" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:232269" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="window" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="autoPlay=false" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" bgcolor="#000000" height="301" width="360"></td></tr><tr style="height: 18px;" valign="middle"><td style="padding: 0px;" colspan="2"><table style="margin: 0px; text-align: center;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="100%" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="middle"><td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;"><a target="_blank" style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.comedycentral.com/colbertreport/full-episodes">Colbert Report Full Episodes</a></td><td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;"><a target="_blank" style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor</a></td><td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;"><a target="_blank" style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.colbertnation.com/video/tag/Jeff+Goldblum">Jeff Goldblum</a></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table>
</div>

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/colberts_noncensus.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/colberts_noncensus.php</guid>
         <category>Polls in the News</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:35:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>US: Climate Change Bill (Rasmussen 6/28-29)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen<br />
6/28-29/09; 1,000 adults, 3% margin of error<br />
Mode: IVR</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/environment/42_say_climate_change_bill_will_hurt_the_economy">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>National</b></p>

<p><i> From what you know about the climate change bill that passed the House, do you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose it?</i></p>

<p>37% Favor, 41% Oppose</p>

<p><i>Will the climate change bill that passed the House of Representatives help the economy, hurt the economy, or have no impact on the economy?</i></p>

<p>19% Help, 42% Hurt<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_climate_change_bill_rasmuss.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_climate_change_bill_rasmuss.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:51:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>US: Health Care (CNN 6/26-28)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>CNN/Opinion Research Corporation<br />
6/26-28/09; 1,026 adults, 3% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/01/health.care.poll/index.html">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>National</b></p>

<p><i>From everything you have heard or read so far, do you favor or oppose Barack Obama's plan to reform health care?</i></p>

<p>51% Favor, 45% Oppose</p>

<p><i>From what you know of the health care reforms which the Administration is working on, do you think the amount you pay for medical care would increase, decrease, or remain the same? </i></p>

<p>54% Increase, 27% Decrease</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_health_care_cnn_62628.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_health_care_cnn_62628.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:18:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>US: Health Care (Quinnipiac 6/23-29)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Quinnipiac<br />
6/23-29/09; 3,063 registered voters, 1.8% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1344">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>National</b></p>

<p><i>Would you be willing or unwilling to pay more in taxes for a health care overhaul plan that reduces health care costs and covers those who don't have health insurance?</i></p>

<p>49% Willing, 45% Unwilling</p>

<p><i>Would you support or oppose a new tax on employees for the health care benefits that they receive from their employers? </i></p>

<p>30% Support, 63% Oppose</p>

<p><i>Do you support or oppose requiring people to have health insurance?</i></p>

<p>44% Support, 51% Oppose</p>

<p><i>Do you support or oppose giving people the option of being covered by a government health insurance plan that would compete with private plans?</i></p>

<p>69% Support, 26% Oppose</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_health_care_quinnipiac_6232.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_health_care_quinnipiac_6232.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:11:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Obama Job Approval - New &quot;All Adults&quot; Chart</title>
         <author>mark&#64;pollster&#46;com (Mark Blumenthal)</author>
         <description>by Mark Blumenthal<![CDATA[<p>Another piece of housekeeping and one of Eric Dienstfrey's final contributions to Pollster.com. We have produced a new chart that includes only polls that report the <a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/-jobapproval-obama-adults.php">Obama job rating among all adults</a>. The <a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama.php">original Obama job rating chart</a> that includes all surveys remains in place; this new chart adds a new way of tracking the trends.</p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/scripts/javascript/loess.js"></script><object height="346" width="450"><param name="chart" value="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/flash/swfs/chart.swf?xml=http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/content/xml/USObamaJobPresAdults.xml&amp;choices=Approve,Disapprove&amp;phone=&amp;ivr=&amp;internet=&amp;mail=&amp;smoothing=&amp;from_date=&amp;to_date=&amp;min_pct=&amp;max_pct=&amp;grid=&amp;points=&amp;trends=&amp;lines=&amp;colors=Disapprove-BF0014,Approve-000000,Undecided-68228B&amp;e=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/flash/swfs/chart.swf?xml=http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/content/xml/USObamaJobPresAdults.xml&amp;choices=Approve,Disapprove&amp;phone=&amp;ivr=&amp;internet=&amp;mail=&amp;smoothing=&amp;from_date=&amp;to_date=&amp;min_pct=&amp;max_pct=&amp;grid=&amp;points=&amp;trends=&amp;lines=&amp;colors=Disapprove-BF0014,Approve-000000,Undecided-68228B&amp;e=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="false" allowscriptaccess="always" height="346" width="450"></object></div>
<p>We have <a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/sometimes_the_magic_works.php">discussed</a> some of the challenges posed to our charts on measures like the Obama job performance rating by pollsters whose results show big "house effects" (consistent differences when compared to other pollsters). Our philosophy has always been to try to include all polls that claim to produce representative samples -- even those based on more controversial methods such as automated polls or those that survey respondents over the internet using pre-recruited panels -- to make it possible to use our interactive chart features to compare and contrast different surveys.<br /></p>
<p>The problem is that if big house effects occur, the trend lines can sometimes display phantom trends when polls with consistently different results are more frequent. This issue crops up most often in the "nose" of the trend line, which moves around more than the rest of the line as we add new polls to our database. The Rasmussen Reports surveys appear to be a big problem in this respect, mostly because they are far more numerous. However, if you use your mouse to click on Obama job ratings that tend to be higher or lower than other polls, you will also see pollsters with similar house effects that poll less often.</p><div align="center"><font style="font-size: 1em;"><b>Chart With All Surveys:</b></font><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/scripts/javascript/loess.js"></script><object height="346" width="450"><param name="chart" value="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/flash/swfs/chart.swf?xml=http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/content/xml/Obama44JobApproval.xml&amp;choices=Approve,Disapprove&amp;phone=&amp;ivr=&amp;internet=&amp;mail=&amp;smoothing=&amp;from_date=&amp;to_date=&amp;min_pct=&amp;max_pct=&amp;grid=&amp;points=&amp;trends=&amp;lines=&amp;colors=Disapprove-BF0014,Approve-000000,Undecided-68228B&amp;e=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/flash/swfs/chart.swf?xml=http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/content/xml/Obama44JobApproval.xml&amp;choices=Approve,Disapprove&amp;phone=&amp;ivr=&amp;internet=&amp;mail=&amp;smoothing=&amp;from_date=&amp;to_date=&amp;min_pct=&amp;max_pct=&amp;grid=&amp;points=&amp;trends=&amp;lines=&amp;colors=Disapprove-BF0014,Approve-000000,Undecided-68228B&amp;e=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="false" allowscriptaccess="always" height="346" width="450"></object></div>
<p>We offer the new all-adult-sample-only charts as one means of reducing the potential for "phantom" trends, though we have other potential improvements in the works. Please let us know what you think.</p><p>PS:&nbsp; A week or so ago we also broke out party identification in two: one is based on results among <a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/party-id.php">all adults</a>, one among surveys of <a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/party-id-rl.php">registered or likely voters</a>. <br /></p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/obama_job_approval_new_all_adu.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/obama_job_approval_new_all_adu.php</guid>
         <category>Pollster.com</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>NY: 2010 Gov, Sen (Marist 6/23-25)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Marist<br />
6/23-25/09; 1,003 Registered voters, 3% margin of error<br />
441 registered Democrats, 5% margin of error<br />
281 registered Republicans, 6% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(source: <a href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/630-paterson%E2%80%99s-approval-rating-still-in-the-tankvoters-dissatisfied-with-handling-of-nys-senate-situation/">Paterson approval</a>, <a href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/630-paterson%E2%80%99s-gubernatorial-prospects-inches-closer-to-giulianidead-heat-with-lazio/">2010 Gov</a>, <a href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/71-getting-to-know-senator-gillibrand/">Gillibrand, 2010 Sen</a>, <a href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/71-tried-and-true-schumer%e2%80%99s-job-approval-stands-firm/">Schumer</a>, <a href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/71-obama-maintains-high-marks-among-new-york-state-voters/">Obama</a>)</p>

<p><b>New York</b></p>

<p><i>Job Approval</i><br />
Gov. Paterson: 21% Excellent/Good, 76% Fair/Poor (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/jobapproval-govpaterson.php">chart</a>)<br />
Sen. Gillibrand: 24 / 43  (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/jobapproval-sengillibrand.php">chart</a>)<br />
Sen. Schumer: 54 / 42  (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/jobapproval-senschumer.php">chart</a>)<br />
Pres. Obama: 63 / 36  (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/jobapproval-presobama.php">chart</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Governor: Democratic Primary</i><br />
69% Cuomo, 24% Paterson (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-gov-dempr.php">trend</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Governor: Republican Primary</i><br />
77% Giuliani, 16% Lazio (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-gov-reppr.php">trend</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Governor: General Election</i><br />
54% Giuliani, 37% Paterson (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-gov-ge-gvp.php">chart</a>)<br />
41% Paterson, 40% Lazio (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-gov-ge.php">trend)</a><br />
68% Cuomo, 22% Lazio (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-gov-ge.php">trend)</a><br />
51% Cuomo, 43% Giuliani (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-gov-ge-gvc.php">chart</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Senate: Democratic Primary</i><br />
Gillibrand 37%, Maloney 28% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-sen-b-dempr.php">trends</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Senate: Republican Primary</i><br />
Pataki 51%, King 36% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-sen-b-reppr.php">trends</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Senate: General Election</i><br />
Gillibrand 46%, Pataki 42% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-sen-b-ge-pvg.php">chart</a>)<br />
Gillibrand 48%, Peter King 32% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ny/10-ny-sen-b-ge-kvg.php">chart</a>)</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/ny_2010_governor_marist_62325.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/ny_2010_governor_marist_62325.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:15:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>US: Sanford Affair (CNN 6/26-28)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>CNN/Opinion Research Corporation<br />
6/26-28/09; 507 adults, 4.5% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(<a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/30/cnn-poll-americans-think-sanford-should-resign/">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>National</b></p>

<p><i> As you may know, South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford recently admitted that he had committed adultery and reimbursed the state for the cost of a government-funded trip during which he saw the woman with whom he was having an affair.  Do you think Sanford should resign his position as Governor, or do you think he should continue to serve as Governor?</i></p>

<p>54% Resign, 44% Continue to serve</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_sanford_affair_cnn_62628.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_sanford_affair_cnn_62628.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:55:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>NH: 2010 Senate (ARG 6/27-29)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p><br />
American Research Group<br />
6/27-29/09; 600 adults, 4% margin of error<br />
Mode: Live telephone interviews</p>

<p>(<a href="http://americanresearchgroup.com/nhpoll/">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>New Hampshire</b></p>

<p><i>Job Approval/Disapproval</i><br />
Gov. Lynch: 35 / 31 (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/nh/job-govlynch.php">chart</a>)<br />
Pres. Obama: 51 / 41 (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/nh/job-presobama.php">chart</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Senate</i> (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/nh/10-nh-sen-ge.php">trends</a>)<br />
Paul Hodes (D) 40%, John Sununu (R) 34%<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/nh_2010_senate_arg_62729.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/nh_2010_senate_arg_62729.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:50:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>MA: 2010 Gov (Rasmussen 6/24)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen<br />
6/24/09; 500 likely voters, 4.5% margin of error<br />
Mode: IVR</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2010/election_2010_state_toplines/massachusetts/toplines_election_2010_massachusettes_governor_june_24_2009">source</a>)</p>

<p><b>Massachusetts</b></p>

<p><i>Job Approval/Disapproval</i><br />
Obama: 63 / 36<br />
Gov. Patrick: 42 / 57</p>

<p><i>Favorable/Unfavorable</i><br />
Patrick: 48 / 51<br />
Christy Mihos (R): 46 / 35<br />
Charlie Baker (R): 37 / 27</p>

<p><i>2010 Governor</i><br />
Mihos 41%, Patrick 40%<br />
Patrick 41%, Baker 36%<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/ma_2010_gov_rasmussen_624.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/ma_2010_gov_rasmussen_624.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:23:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Welcome Emily - Farewell Eric </title>
         <author>mark&#64;pollster&#46;com (Mark Blumenthal)</author>
         <description>by Mark Blumenthal<![CDATA[<p>Regular readers have probably noticed a new name appearing on the "poll update" entries on Pollster.com. Emily Swanson, a recent graduate of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, has joined the Pollster.com team and will be posting and updating our charts and tables regularly from here on out. Welcome Emily!</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Emily's appearance means that we are saying farewell to Eric Dienstfrey after nearly three years of relentless hard work and dedicated service. As <a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/job_opening_at_pollstercom.php">announced</a> a few months ago, Eric has been accepted to the Graduate Program in Film Studies at, coincidentally, the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Department of Communication Arts. So he is moving on to bigger and better things.</p>
<p>Sadly, today is officially Eric's last day at Pollster.com. I exaggerate not one bit when I say that the site as you know it would not exist but for his skill and tenacity. We will miss him, but wish him the best of luck in all of his future endeavors.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/welcome_emily_farewell_eric.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/welcome_emily_farewell_eric.php</guid>
         <category>Pollster.com</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:03:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>FL: 2010 Gov, Sen (Mason-Dixon 6/24-26/09)</title>
         <author>elswanson2&#64;gmail&#46;com (Emily Swanson)</author>
         <description>by Emily Swanson<![CDATA[<p>Mason-Dixon/Ron Sachs Communications<br />
6/24-26/09; 625 likely voters, 4% margin of error<br />
300 likely Democratic primary voters<br />
300 likely Republican primary voters<br />
Mode: Live Telephone Interviews</p>

<p>(Source: <a href="http://www.ronsachs.com/docs/flcabinetpoll06_30_09.pdf">Gov</a>, <a href="http://www.ronsachs.com/docs/floridasenatepoll62909.pdf">Sen</a>)</p>

<p><b>Florida</b></p>

<p><i>Favorable/Unfavorable</i><br />
Bill McCollum (R): 29 / 13<br />
Alex Sink (D): 24 / 9<br />
Charlie Crist (R): 49 / 21 (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/fav-crist.php">chart</a>)<br />
Marco Rubio (R): 18 / 11<br />
Kendrick Meek (D): 11 / 5</p>

<p><i>2010 Governor: Democratic Primary</i><br />
Sink 49%, Michael Arth 4% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/-10-fl-gov-dempr.php">trends</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Governor: Republican Primary</i><br />
McCollum 53%, Paula Dockery 4% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/10-fl-gov-reppr-wc.php">trends</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Governor: General Election</i><br />
McCollum 41%, Sink 35% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/10-fl-gov-ge-mcvs.php">chart</a>)<br />
Sink 43%, Dockery 18% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/10-fl-gov-ge.php">trend</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Senate: Democratic Primary</i><br />
Meek 27%, Brown 12% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/10-fl-sen-dempr.php">chart</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Senate: Republican Primary</i><br />
Crist 51%, Rubio 23% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/10-fl-sen-reppr-wc.php">chart</a>)</p>

<p><i>2010 Senate: General Election</i><br />
Crist 48%, Meek 26% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/10-fl-sen-ge-cvm.php">chart</a>)<br />
Crist 55%, Brown 24% (<a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/10-fl-sen-ge.php">trend</a>)</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/fl_2010_gov_masondixon_6242609.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.pollster.com/blogs/fl_2010_gov_masondixon_6242609.php</guid>
         <category>Poll Update</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:57:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
 