December 07, 2006
I wrote earlier this week about an open-ended presidential preference question from Gallup. In another free-for-today-only analysis, Gallup's Lydia Saad provides results from a different set of open-ends -- questions that provide no answer categories and allow respondents to answer in their own words -- on the four best known Democrats mentioned as potential candidates. The results show that a majority of Democrats have good things to say about Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama, fewer are positive about Al Gore and nearly half of Democrats react negatively to John Kerry.
Gallup used their national panel survey to ask a simple question about each of the four: "What comes to your mind when you think about [name]?" The Gallup interviewers wrote down the verbatim responses, and then the Gallup analysts "coded" those responses, assigning each to a category (such as "experienced," "strong," "like him/her," etc.). They then classified each of the categories as positive, negative or other. The report provides results to those classifications, both among the 1,003 adults and among an unspecified subgroup of those who think of themselves as Democrats (presumably about 350 interviews). The results among Democrats are as follows:

This quick post does no justice to the level of detail available in the full analysis, but some of the most obvious findings:
- Comments about Hilary Clinton are net negative among all adults (37% to 50%) but nearly two-to-one positive among Democrats (56% to 31%).
- The positive comments about Clinton among Democrats are mostly about her leadership credentials (qualified, experienced), strength and intelligence.
- The independents and Republicans that dislike Clinton are apt to say they dislike her personally, Democrats are more likely to worry that she is not electable (5%) or that she is "riding Bill's coattails" (10%).
- When asked about Barack Obama, more than a third of Americans (38%) and more than a quarter of Democrats (28%) are unable to offer anything specific that comes to mind.
- Comments about John Kerry are overwhelmingly negative. Even among Democrats, 49% offer negative comments compared to only 28% that have something positive to say.
Of course, the sample of Democrats is relatively small and represents, at best, all Democratic identifiers nationally -- not likely Democratic primary voters and certainly not likely voters or caucus participants in early states like Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada or South Carolina.
It is also worth noting that these results are from a Gallup "panel" survey. The methodology blurb at the end of the analysis tells us that "respondents were randomly drawn from Gallup's nationally representative household panel, which was originally recruited through random selection methods." Generally speaking, a panel is a pool of respondents who agree to regularly participate in opinion surveys. When Gallup says their panel is "nationally representative," it presumably means that panel members were recruited using a conventional telephone survey and a random-digit-dial (RDD) sample.
What we do not know (unless Gallup has posted a more detailed description of their methodology elsewhere that I have overlooked) is the size of the panel, the typical response rate, how Gallup weights or statistically adjusts the results and how often panel members agree to be interviewed. The two key issues with any panel survey -- even in we assume that the pool of potential respondents is a representative random sample -- are (1) whether a willingness to be interviewed more than once allows an additional bias to creep into the sample and (2) whether the experience of being interviewed changes the respondent. On the last point, assume that respondents complete a Gallup survey on issues in the news. Do those individuals subsequently pay more attention to issues in the news and become better informed?
I raise all of this, in part, because National Journal's Hotline yesterday reported that party identification for this Gallup panel survey is 35% Democratic, 36% Republican and 29% independent or other. The Republican percentage (36%) is considerably higher than on recent national Gallup surveys. Party identification among all adults has averaged 35% Democrat, 28% Republican on Gallup's last five national surveys conducted in October and November, and 35% Democrat, 30% Republican on all surveys conducted since July.
Of course, as discussed often both here and on Mystery Pollster, Gallup does not weight by party, so random variation in the results for party ID is to be expected. Still with a panel based sample, it is a good idea to keep an eye on this sort of variation.
-- Mark Blumenthal
December 07, 2006 in Measurement Issues, The 2008 Race
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.pollster.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.fcgi/3209.
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Open-Ends on the Dems:
Comments
Post a comment
08 STATEWIDE PRIMARIES
US
Dem,
Rep
Upcoming
Kentucky (5/20)
Oregon (5/20)
Puerto Rico (6/1)
Montana (6/3)
South Dakota (6/3)
2008 POLL DATA
Pres General Election:
McCain vs
US: Clinton, Obama
AL: Clinton, Obama
AK: Clinton, Obama
AZ: Clinton, Obama
AR: Clinton, Obama
CA: Clinton, Obama
CO: Clinton, Obama
CT: Clinton, Obama
DE: Clinton, Obama
FL: Clinton, Obama
GA: Clinton, Obama
HI: Clinton, Obama
ID: Clinton, Obama
IL: Clinton, Obama
IN: Clinton, Obama
IA: Clinton, Obama
KS: Clinton, Obama
KY: Clinton, Obama
LA: Clinton, Obama
ME: Clinton, Obama
MD: Clinton, Obama
MA: Clinton, Obama
MI: Clinton, Obama
MN: Clinton, Obama
MS: Clinton, Obama
MO: Clinton, Obama
MT: Clinton, Obama
NE: Clinton, Obama
NV: Clinton, Obama
NH: Clinton, Obama
NJ: Clinton, Obama
NM: Clinton, Obama
NY: Clinton, Obama
NC: Clinton, Obama
ND: Clinton, Obama
OH: Clinton, Obama
OK: Clinton, Obama
OR: Clinton, Obama
PA: Clinton, Obama
RI: Clinton, Obama
SC: Clinton, Obama
SD: Clinton, Obama
TN: Clinton, Obama
TX: Clinton, Obama
UT: Clinton, Obama
VT: Clinton, Obama
VA: Clinton, Obama
WA: Clinton, Obama
WV: Clinton, Obama
WI: Clinton, Obama
WY: Clinton, Obama
Sen General Election:
Alaska
Colorado
Louisiana
Maine
Minnesota
Mississippi (Special)
Nebraska
New Hampshire
New Mexico (Pearce)
New Mexico (Wilson)
North Carolina
Texas
Virginia
PUBLIC POLLSTERS
ABC News
AP-IPSOS
CBS News
Democracy Corps (D)
Diageo/Hotline Poll
Economist/YouGov
EPIC/MRA
The Field Poll
FOX News
GWU/Battleground
Gallup
Harris Interactive
IBD/TIPP
ICR - International Communications Research
LA Times/Bloomberg
Mason Dixon Polling and Research
Marist Poll
Market Shares Corporation
Mitchell Interactive
NBC/Wall Street Journal
New York Times
Opinion Research Corporation
Pew Research Center
Polimetrix
Princeton Survey Research Associates International
Public Agenda
Public Policy Polling
Quinnipiac University Poll
Rasmussen Reports
Selzer & Company
Suffolk University Political Research Center
Survey USA
Time/SRBI
Washington Post
World Public Opinion
Zogby International
POLL BLOGS AND SITES
Political Arithmetik
Crosstabs.org
The Polling Report
Electoral-Vote.com
R. Chung's Graphics
Prof. Wang's State Poll Meta-Analysis
Prof. Pollkatz Pool of Polls
Slate: Election Scorecard
Public Opinion Pros
Frank Newport: Gallup Guru
Carl Bialik: The Numbers Guy
Poll Positions: Kathy Frankovic
The Numbers: Gary Langer
Washington Post: Behind the Numbers
SURVEY RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS
American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR)
The National Council on Public Polls (NCPP)
Council of American Survey Research Organizations (CASRO)
The World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR)
The Council for Marketing and Opinion Research (CMOR)
Marketing Research Association
ARCHIVES
May 11, 2008 - May 17, 2008
May 4, 2008 - May 10, 2008
April 27, 2008 - May 3, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
All pollster.com archives
MysteryPollster.com archives






Knemon:
No Edwards, huh?
Posted on December 11, 2006 12:25 PM